Outline:

• TLDR
• Historical Facts Recap
• Decision Rationale
• Concepts and Consequences
• Actionable Next Steps

TL;DR

stakefish will be voting no on Juno Proposal 16

Mintscan - Chain explorer by COSMOSTATION

The Protocols Team at stakefish has deliberated on:

• the facts of the situation as they have most recently surfaced beyond the assumptions initially made
• the consequences of voting in favor both literally to a non-trivial number of Juno ecosystem members and ideologically to the concepts of self-sovereignty and precedent it would set
• the underlying concepts that must be addressed for the future of Proof-of-Stake and on-chain governance

Historical facts recap

• These are the facts in historical order that led to Juno Proposal 16
• Sample of public statements and resources against the proposal
• Sample of public statements and resources for the proposal
• Sample of public statements and resources neutral to the proposal

Decision Rationale

stakefish voted NO for the following reasons: